<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Loses With Digital Television?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matthewsworkbench.com/who-loses-with-digital-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matthewsworkbench.com/who-loses-with-digital-tv/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:36:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doc Searls</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewsworkbench.com/who-loses-with-digital-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Searls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewsworkbench.com/who-loses-with-digital-tv/#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Worse, all the focus so far, on behalf of have-nots, is the cost of buying a converter box. Almost nobody is paying attention to the fact that UHF TV lacks the range of VHF, and that digital TV signals in some cases will be worse than analog ones ... or gone altogether.

It&#039;ll be interesting to see what happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worse, all the focus so far, on behalf of have-nots, is the cost of buying a converter box. Almost nobody is paying attention to the fact that UHF TV lacks the range of VHF, and that digital TV signals in some cases will be worse than analog ones &#8230; or gone altogether.</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be interesting to see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
