Comments on: Alaskan Shortwave Test http://www.matthewsworkbench.com/alaskan-shortwave-test/ Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:36:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Matthew Reed http://www.matthewsworkbench.com/alaskan-shortwave-test/comment-page-1/#comment-165 Matthew Reed Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:59:19 +0000 http://www.matthewsworkbench.com/radio/alaskan-shortwave-test/#comment-165 Thanks for the comment and the clarification. I like your ideas for local broadcasting on shortwave and I hope the FCC changes the rules to allow this. Good luck with your efforts. Thanks for the comment and the clarification. I like your ideas for local
broadcasting on shortwave and I hope the FCC changes the rules to allow
this. Good luck with your efforts.

]]> By: Bennett Kobb http://www.matthewsworkbench.com/alaskan-shortwave-test/comment-page-1/#comment-163 Bennett Kobb Wed, 20 Aug 2008 01:39:13 +0000 http://www.matthewsworkbench.com/radio/alaskan-shortwave-test/#comment-163 Thanks for the visit, Matthew. The Alaskan experiment is not at 26 MHz. It will use other bands more suited to coverage of that very large state. 26 MHz would be for city or smaller coverage. International broadcasting is in decline in the developed world, but other countries besides the U.S. face a shortage of frequency spectrum for local broadcasting. The unique 26 MHz band, combined with DRM could be one solution if broadcasters and receiver makers get on board. Thanks for the visit, Matthew.

The Alaskan experiment is not at 26 MHz. It will use other bands more suited to coverage of that very large state. 26 MHz would be for city or smaller coverage.

International broadcasting is in decline in the developed world, but other countries besides the U.S. face a shortage of frequency spectrum for local broadcasting. The unique 26 MHz band, combined with DRM could be one solution if broadcasters and receiver makers get on board.

]]>